Cyber Operations Between Russia and Ukraine: A Study of Causes and Outcomes

This article examines the reasons for resorting to cyber warfare in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and how technology has intensified the conflict, pushing it into a more dangerous trajectory. Through successive cyberattacks on Ukraine, Russia managed to achieve tactical gains and strategic objectives, further solidifying its position in the region and realizing its key goals.

1. The Concept of Cybersecurity:

Cybersecurity is an integral part of national policies, focusing on protecting citizens’ digital data, corporate information, and various state sectors, ultimately safeguarding national security. Many countries, recognizing its importance, have prioritized digital defense as a key aspect of their security strategies. More than 130 nations have established specialized cybersecurity departments within their national security teams.

2. The Concept of Cyber Warfare:

Cyber warfare refers to actions taken by a state to attack the enemy’s information systems, aiming to damage them while defending its own systems. If cyberattacks lead to armed conflict, they can result in physical injuries, deaths, or damage to properties. Cyber wars are limitless in scope and ambiguous in objectives. They are less costly but potentially more destructive than traditional wars due to their multifaceted goals. These wars often lead to civilian casualties and significant harm to a nation’s infrastructure.

3. The Historical Development of Cyber Warfare Between Russia and Ukraine:

Russia’s focus on the political dimensions of cybersecurity began in the 1990s with the establishment of the Russian National Security Council in 1992. Other institutions dedicated to electronic issues and Russian cybersecurity were subsequently founded. By 2000, Russia’s interest in cybersecurity had become more pronounced, and by 2005, it had created its first cyber weapon, “Arborus.”

The first recorded cyberattacks on Ukrainian private and governmental institutions occurred in 2013 during public protests in Ukraine. Social media platforms were targeted to manipulate media narratives and influence public opinion, aiming to prevent Ukraine from joining the European Union.

Between 2014 and 2016, a Russian hacking group known as Fancy Bear (APT28) attacked Ukraine’s missile and artillery forces, destroying over 80% of the Ukrainian D-30 howitzers.

In 2014, a group called Cyber Berkut emerged in Ukraine, supporting pro-Moscow sentiments and opposing Western powers. This group admitted to conducting cyberattacks during Ukraine’s parliamentary elections, including breaching the Central Election Commission’s systems.

One of the most significant cyberattacks occurred in December 2015 when Russian hackers took down the electricity grid in western Ukraine’s Ivano-Frankivsk region, causing a total blackout. This attack was repeated the following year by Russian professionals.

Ukraine, in response, conducted nine successful cyber operations in May 2016, targeting websites of the separatist “Donetsk People’s Republic” as well as Russian anti-Ukrainian propaganda sites and private military companies.

The NotPetya attacks in 2017 were among the costliest cyber operations. These attacks crippled Ukraine’s banking and governmental networks and spread to other countries like Italy, the UK, the US, and Australia, causing tens of billions of dollars in damage.

In January 2022, before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, hackers disabled dozens of Ukrainian government websites, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From February to April of the same year, over 200 cyberattacks were launched against Ukraine, targeting nearly 70 government entities, according to Microsoft.

Reasons for Cyber Warfare Between Russia and Ukraine:

Cyber operations are part of the broader combat between the two sides. The conflict traces back to NATO’s efforts to expand eastward in the early 2000s by including countries like Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Poland. NATO’s attempt to bring Ukraine into its fold in 2008 failed.

Western countries renewed their expansion efforts in 2013 through an association agreement between Ukraine and the European Union. However, this agreement was frozen under Ukrainian President Yanukovych, who leaned towards Russia, sparking violent protests in Ukraine. These events culminated in Yanukovych fleeing to Russia in 2014.

Following the “Euromaidan” revolution, Petro Poroshenko, a staunch proponent of Ukraine’s integration into the EU, was elected president. Taking advantage of Ukraine’s political instability, Russia launched military operations in Crimea, claiming it as historically part of Russia. A referendum in Crimea in March 2014 showed that 95% of its residents favored separating from Ukraine, leading to the region’s annexation by Russia.

In 2019, Volodymyr Zelenskyy became president of Ukraine, striving to resolve the Donbas conflict by implementing the Minsk II agreements. However, tensions escalated as NATO expanded its influence eastward, designating Ukraine a “Enhanced Opportunity Partner” in 2020. Despite Putin’s demands that NATO refrain from admitting Ukraine, NATO refused to comply.

Russia’s military operations in Ukraine began on February 24, 2022, citing alleged genocide against ethnic Russians in Donbas. These operations were preceded by large-scale cyberattacks that helped Russia transition from strategic objectives, such as crippling Ukraine’s military and economic capabilities, to tactical goals like espionage and data theft.

Outcomes:

Russia achieved several tactical objectives through its cyber operations, advancing towards its broader strategic goals.

A – Influencing Public Opinion and Lowering Ukrainian Morale:

Russia used cyber operations to spread fear and confusion among Ukrainians, making it easier to achieve its military objectives. This was evident during the 2014 annexation of Crimea, where Russia launched a vast information campaign targeting both domestic and Crimean public opinion. Russian state media outlets like RT and Voice of Russia were used to shape public perception against Ukraine.

In 2014, Russian cyberattacks targeted Ukraine’s Central Election Commission systems, causing chaos and instability.

During the 2022 invasion, Russia spread fear through fake news, such as claims of its complete control over Kyiv, which weakened the Ukrainian public’s morale.

Russian hackers also breached Ukrainian broadcasting networks, falsely announcing President Zelenskyy’s surrender.

Additionally, the Belarusian cyber group Ghostwriter, allied with Russia, hacked social media platforms to disseminate misleading videos showing Ukrainian forces as weak and defeated.

B – Targeting Civil Infrastructure and Crippling Ukraine Economically:

Cyberattacks caused severe economic damage, especially when they targeted key infrastructure such as the energy and power grids. In 2015, Russian cyberattacks left over a quarter of a million Ukrainians without electricity in western Ukraine, a tactic repeated the following year. Banks, transport systems, and public services were also affected, undermining investor confidence and destabilizing the Ukrainian economy.

C – Eroding Trust in the Ukrainian Government:

Repeated cyberattacks on Ukrainian infrastructure, such as the electricity grids, and the destruction of military assets, including 80% of Ukrainian D-30 howitzers, weakened public trust in the government. In 2022, during the initial stages of the Russian invasion, cyberattacks disrupted Ukrainian satellite communications, further isolating military units.

Conclusion:

Cyber operations are another dimension of the multifaceted Russian-Ukrainian conflict, which has evolved into a complex struggle involving security, economics, politics, technology, and military power. Russia will continue to leverage its technological tools to inflict damage on Ukraine, while Ukraine seeks Western support to counter Russian cyberattacks. Both sides have achieved varying degrees of success in disrupting each other’s efforts.

SAKHRI Mohamed
SAKHRI Mohamed

I hold a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and International Relations in addition to a Master's degree in International Security Studies. Alongside this, I have a passion for web development. During my studies, I acquired a strong understanding of fundamental political concepts and theories in international relations, security studies, and strategic studies.

Articles: 14918

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *