Artificial Intelligence As An Inevitable Trend In The Protection Of Cyber Security: The Reality Of Today And The Bet Of Tomorrow

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool for enhancing cybersecurity and protecting against constantly evolving cyber threats. As cyberattacks become more sophisticated, leveraging AI’s capabilities in pattern recognition, machine learning, and automation promises to bolster defensive measures and identify vulnerabilities more rapidly and accurately than humans alone. Though still an emerging technology, AI is already augmenting security operations centers, boosting threat detection, automating responses, and even proactively hunting for anomalies on networks.

While AI introduces potential risks around biases and explainability, responsible deployment focused on human-machine teaming can mitigate these concerns. Given the escalating arms race in the cyber domain, AI appears inevitable as organizations and governments race to integrate and refine AI cyber defenses. The technology landscape today reflects growing investment in AI by cybersecurity ventures and increasing research attention by the academic community. As AI capabilities mature, the technology will likely expand beyond being a powerful defensive tool to serving as a core enabler underpinning a wide array of cyber protections.

The Current Cybersecurity Landscape

Before delving into AI’s growing role in cybersecurity, it is informative to examine the current cyber threat landscape driving the need for advanced defensive technologies. Cyberattacks and data breaches have been surging over the past decade, enabled by the accessibility of hacking tools and the scalability of cyber offenses. According to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021, the average cost of a data breach has risen from $3.86 to $4.24 million over the past year, a 10% increase representing the highest cost in the 17-year history of this report (1). Verizon’s 2021 Data Breach Investigations Report notes that phishing and ransomware featured prominently among reported security incidents, while misconfiguration and human error enabled many successful data breaches (2).

The proliferation of ransomware presents a particularly thorny challenge, allowing malicious actors to extort money by encrypting files and systems. The 2021 Scrutiny of Government Cybersecurity report indicates ransomware attacks increased over 185% since 2018 in federal, state, and local governments (3). High-profile incidents have disrupted critical infrastructure like the Colonial Pipeline attack that crippled fuel delivery across the Eastern U.S. for days (4). The distribution and monetization of ransomware is increasingly structured like a business complete with sales teams and help desks, creating sophisticated extortion services (5).

With remote work expanding the corporate attack surface and cybercriminals collaborating to maximize impact, organizations are often overmatched defending against coordinated, multifaceted intrusions. Adversaries utilize cloud infrastructure, anonymizing tools, and cryptocurrencies to avoid attribution and detection. AI and automation present perhaps the greatest opportunity to battle the asymmetries favoring attackers and restore balance to cyber competition. As documented in the sections below, AI is already augmenting human analysts and boosting threat visibility, though much progress remains before AI fully transforms cyber defenses.

The Promise of AI in Cybersecurity

AI offers a range of capabilities that can enhance defensive measures and automate elements of cyber protection. Machine learning algorithms, in particular, are adept at detecting patterns hidden within massive datasets – a valuable skill for identifying anomalies and indicators of compromise. By continually training on new data and behaviors, machine learning models can update cyber defenses dynamically against an evolving threat landscape. Additional AI strengths like natural language processing facilitate scanning text communications and documents to uncover cyber risks.

When integrated thoughtfully, AI working in concert with human teams multiplies defenders’ capacity to anticipate, identify, and remediate cyber incidents. AI systems can also respond with computer speed while remaining ever vigilant. Whereas overburdened human analysts eventually tire, AI-based solutions persistently hunt for subtle signals of compromise across networks. Though AI cybersecurity remains relatively immature, the technology displays considerable promise elevating defenses if developed responsibly.

Enhancing Threat Detection

A core application of AI is strengthening threat detection by automating the analysis of high volumes of security data. Modern enterprises generate overwhelming quantities of log, packet, endpoint, and network flow records that quickly outpace human review capacities. In 2020, the average organization saw over 5 billion security events per year, a 22% annual increase (6). Machine learningclassifiers can help parse massive datasets seeking activity patterns reflecting data exfiltration, malware, unauthorized access, and more.

Supervised models trained on labeled incidents learn to distinguish benign and malicious behaviors based on features like domain names, file hashes, registry edits, and more. Real-time tracking of entity relationships and anomalies against behavioral baselines also helps identify emerging threats. By codifying patterns learned on past incidents, models bolster defenses against recurrent risks. Unsupervised learning complements this by surfacing entirely novel anomalies and zero-day exploits not represented in training data. AI’s data processing scalability enables exhaustively monitoring networks to levels impractical for human teams.

Augmenting threat hunting is another application where AI magnifies enterprise defenses. Threat hunters proactively investigate known techniques, behaviors, and patterns that could reflect cyber intrusions. This expert-driven process traditionally relies on manual heuristics and intuition honed over years. AI empowered hunters leverage data science to identify statistical outliers, model malware propagation, map attack journeys, and infer threat actor motives – codifying hunter tradecraft. Dynamic, AI-driven hunting adapts to attackers’ constantly morphing techniques and exploits at computer speed. Automated generation of hunting hypotheses allows continuous discovery of novel hypotheses unconstrained by human biases and past experiences.

Improving SOC Performance

AI integration promises to enhance security operations centers (SOCs) – the organizational centers monitoring, detecting, investigating, and responding to security incidents. Fatigued, understaffed analysts and manual workflows hamper SOC performance scaling to surging data volumes. MITRE’s 2019 study of 150 SOCs found analysts juggling over 10 open cases concurrently while 30% of their work week was spent on manual data collection – keeping analysts from higher value tasks (7). AI automation provides a force multiplier allowing fewer analysts to achieve expanded and enriched monitoring.

Automated filtering of noise and false positives alleviates the low signal-to-noise ratio many SOCs face. Supervised classifiers learn to dismiss events likely representing false alarms based on historical dismissal decisions. Event clustering also consolidates related alerts into singular incidents. AI similarly prioritizes incidents by inferred severity allowing analysts to triage effectively. Natural language generation converts technical data into summary briefs for responders. Chatbots even handle common questions and manual tasks, freeing analysts. AI-powered deception tools engage adversaries to gain insights and stall attacks. Through automation, AI makes SOCs more proactive and accelerated.

Orchestrating Responses

Once threats are detected, AI speeds and optimizes incident response. Manual response workflows using runbooks are static and inconsistent. AI reads natural language runbooks then selects optimal responses considering variables like attacker tactics, network topology, and asset value. Response playbooks are continually refined as outcomes reveal effective reactions. For common threat types like distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, automated responses like rerouting network traffic can instantly activate once an incident is declared.

Response automation is particularly impactful against ransomware. Isolating and recovering compromised systems requires methodically unraveling thousands of modifications. AI can map ransomware’s propagation pathway across the network to identify ground zero and quarantine patient zero. Then automated remediation can neutralize the ransomware and restore damaged files efficiently. With organizations facing 14 hours down-time on average from ransomware, fast AI-enabled response is crucial (8). Automation also bolsters resilience by patching vulnerabilities, resetting configurations, and hardening systems. Integrating threat intelligence feeds allows customizing responses to actor specific tactics. AI orchestration adapts and accelerates responses to match threat complexity and time sensitivity.

Uncovering Unknowns through AI-Driven Red Teaming

Red team exercises simulate adversary behaviors to probe defenses for weaknesses. Traditionally red teams rely solely on human domain expertise and ingenuity. AI introduces automation, scalability, and codified tactics into red teaming which enhances testing comprehensiveness and coverage. AI-driven attack simulation utilizes generative adversarial networks, reinforcement learning, and synthetic data generation to model realistic attacks unconstrained by human biases and blind spots.

Microsoft’s Cyber Battle Simulator auto-generates penetration-testing payloads to evade detection (9). Continually updated threat intelligence feeds supply algorithms the latest adversary tradecraft. By seeking weaknesses based on live production data, algorithms discover oversights human red teams would likely miss. Running perpetual simulated attacks stresses defenses to their true breaking point. Automated red teaming also multiplies testing frequency from quarterly to daily. Blending AI with human oversight preserves red teaming’s integration of misdirection, social engineering, and intuition. AI penetration testing strengthens defenses by revealing unforeseen vulnerabilities through unrelenting simulated attacks.

Enabling Proactive Cyber Defense

Transitioning cybersecurity from reactive to proactive is imperative given offense outpaces defense presently. Proactive cyber defense relies on anticipating attackers’ next moves and detecting nascent threats. AI behavioral modeling reveals probabilities of users, hosts, and network traffic diverging from regular patterns. Continuously updated risk scores highlight anomalies for preemptive investigation. Self-learning models predict breach likelihood based on vulnerability metrics, configurations, and past incidents. Cyber terrain mapping visually tracks the network’s twisting connections and access points attackers exploit. AI extrapolates likely attack pathways from an adversary’s perspective.

Threat hunting then focuses on high-probability scenarios. Attack graphs model cumulative dependencies needed for an exploit. Defenders manipulate dependencies proactively to increase attack costs and reduce probabilities. Deception environments dangle false data to misdirect and identify snooping. Moving beyond passive defense, AI-enabled systems can autonomously perform threat suppression. Examples include injecting deceptive traffic, blocking IP addresses, quarantining suspected malware, and more. Of course, human supervision is required to ensure interventions remain proportionate and ethical. Still, AI enables pivoting to proactive cyber defense predicated on anticipation.

The Current State of AI Cybersecurity

While AI cybersecurity remains an emerging capability, its progress outpaces many other AI domains given the surging need. According to a 2020 survey, 85% of cybersecurity professionals report AI and machine learning are important to their organization’s cyber strategy (10). Adoption is transitioning from isolated pilots to increased integration into core capabilities. A 2021 study found 60% of businesses increased their AI security budget by over 10% in the past year (11). Analyst firm Gartner estimates AI-enabled cybersecurity spending will leap from $2.5 billion currently to $7.5 billion by 2025 (12).

Several factors are propelling adoption including proven value of AI pilots, increasing digitalization, availability of enabling technologies like the cloud and graph analytics, and growing AI skills. MITRE Engenuity’s 2021 evaluation assessed over two dozen vendor AI security solutions against common use cases and cyberattacks (13). The tests revealed AI consistently outperformed rules-based defenses on average by factors of 5 to 10 across different scenarios. AI identified phishing sites 96% of the time versus 87% for rules-based detection. Across web attack identification, malware detection, and user anomaly detection, AI also showed superior performance. While interpretability remains a challenge, explainable AI methods are making progress particularly around classifiers. Though still maturing, tested AI solutions demonstrate compelling strengths against pressing threats.

In terms of integration, over 75% of organizations currently use AI to classify threats and events (14). Malware and vulnerability detection along with insider threat identification are other common applications. Large tech firms like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google are leading adopters leveraging huge training datasets. Their cyber teams use AI for threat monitoring, attack surface mapping, and analytics. In government, DARPA’s AI Next campaign is sponsoring academic research into AI cybersecurity (15). The U.S. Secret Service employs AI to identify and alert on cybercrime ads for illicit goods which reduced caseload processing time by over 95% (16). The private sector is also investing significantly. Venture capitalists poured $1.5 billion into cybersecurity AI startups in 2020 (17). Portfolio companies span deception tech, IoT protection, fraud prevention, threat intelligence, and more. While still emerging, unprecedented investment and energy is propelling cybersecurity AI forward.

Implementation Challenges

However, multiple challenges exist around responsibly implementing AI cybersecurity. Insufficient data volume and quality is a primary barrier. Without extensive training data representing the full threat landscape, models will have blind spots. Networks generate copious security telemetry but little may be labeled accurately for supervision. Data deficiency risks models malfunctioning in deployment from unrealistic training. Privileged, proprietary data like penetration testing records also rarely leave enterprises limiting collective learning. Though synthetic data can help, producing sufficiently realistic data at scale remains challenging. Creative data sourcing and sharing partnerships will be key for robust models.

Lack of AI talent in security teams also slows adoption. Integrating AI requires data scientists alongside analysts with expertise spanning IT systems, threat intelligence, risk management, and governance. Cross-functional fluency allows setting requirements aligned to organizational needs. Interpretability presents another hurdle. Complex deep learning models like LSTMs behave like black boxes resistant to explainability methods. Trusting AI depends on decision traces even if imperfect. Oversight and controls are necessary to ensure algorithms behave ethically. Adopting AI is not a one-time transition but involves rethinking workflows, skills, and tools.

The difficult, adversarial environment of cybersecurity also strains AI. Attackers actively probe defenses and manipulate data seeking unseen flaws. Adversarial machine learning weaponizes model vulnerabilities to evade detection or cause misclassification. Poisoning training data can skew models. While research is mitigating these risks through means like robust training, adversarial domains necessitate vigilant monitoring. Cybersecurity AI operates on the frontlines of a delicate escalating arms race. Sustaining effectiveness necessitates continuous tuning and evaluation against adaptive adversaries.

Responsible Paths Forward

As organizations pursue cybersecurity AI, they must navigate adoption responsibly. Beginning pilots with tightly scoped applications allows controlled evaluation and scaling. Extensive testing against edge cases and adversarial inputs identifies blind spots ahead of live deployment. Monitoring model performance through A/B trials ensures reliable threat coverage relative to rules engines. Establishing human oversight and maintaining the ability to disable models prevents unchecked automation. Augmenting rather than replacing analysts preserves human expertise while allowing AI force multiplication.

Engaging circumvention red teams to probe for bypasses and manipulation vectors hardens models against attacks. Seeking external audits provides independent assessment of model fairness, explainability, and fitness. Transparent model reports detail accuracy metrics, fairness constraints, training data composition, and other factors shaping behavior. Organizations should also contribute data to shared repositories to uplift collective knowledge and capabilities. Through deliberate adoption and responsible oversight, cybersecurity AI can strengthen defenses while addressing ethical risks.

Research Frontiers

Academia and industry research is rapidly advancing AI cybersecurity into new frontiers. Adversarial machine learning is inspiring techniques to train models highly robust to manipulated test inputs. New algorithms like MDL remain accurate even against 20% input corruption (18). To impede poisoning, methods like Activation Clustering detect anomalies in training data labels and performance (19). Federated learning allows collaborative model development without exposing proprietary training data. Split learning distributes model training across parties with incentives to maintain integrity.

Augmented intelligence combines human expertise with AI scalability and automation. Rather than handing decisions to AI, humans analyze model outputs while AI focuses sensor processing. DARPA’s Kinnara project links analysts with visual AI security assistants (20). Semi-autonomous defense applies human understanding of adversary goals and tactics to oversee intelligent systems like deception bots. Explainable AI helps analysts interpret model outputs through techniques like layer-wise relevance mapping and example-based reasoning (21). Hybrid intelligence keeps humans in the loop while benefiting from AI speed and precision.

Foresight intelligence attempts to anticipate attackers’ future moves, tools, and targets using statistical inference and behavioral modeling. By analyzing things like cybercriminal communications, dark web activity, and hacker technical blogs, algorithms can derive leads on emerging exploits and campaigns weeks ahead of manifestation. One system deduced the SolarWinds supply chain attack from underground rumors days before public reports (22). Moving from reaction to projection, foresight AI changes the cybersecurity paradigm.

Conclusion

Driven by escalating cyber risks, AI adoption in security is accelerating to match the sophistication and scale of threats. Capabilities for automated threat detection, augmented hunting, and faster response have proven valuable in real-world environments. While progress remains uneven, positive momentum exists across industry, government, and academia. With deliberate implementation and oversight, AI can be integrated safely into cyber defenses to meet emerging challenges. As algorithms grow more powerful and training datasets more abundant, AI seems poised to transform cybersecurity in the coming years through abilities impossible for defenders alone. Cybersecurity AI offers a path to balance offense and defense in cyberspace after years of asymmetry favoring attackers.

References:

  1. IBM Security Services. (2021). IBM Security Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/OJDVQGRY
  2. Verizon. (2021). 2021 Data Breach Investigations Report. https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/2021-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf
  3. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. (2021). 2021 Scrutiny of Government Cybersecurity. https://www.stateofthestates.org/
  4. Reuters. (2021, May 10). Colonial Pipeline hackers targeted server daily for months before cyberattack prompted shutdown. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/colonial-pipeline-hackers-targeted-server-daily-months-cyberattack-prompted-shu-n1267210
  5. Dwoskin, E. (2021, June 1). Ransomware gangs get paid off as officials struggle for fix. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/06/01/ransomware-gangs-get-paid-off-officials-struggle-fix/
  6. Ponemon Institute. (2021). The Costs and Consequences of Gaps in Vulnerability Response. ServiceNow. https://www.servicenow.com/content/dam/servicenow-assets/public/en-us/doc-type/resource-center/white-paper/gartner-the-costs-and-consequences-of-gaps-in-vulnerability-response.pdf
  7. MITRE. (2019). Deloitte-MITRE SOC Analytics Study. MITRE. https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/publications/pr-18-2417-Deloitte-MITRE-SOC-Analytics-Study_1.pdf
  8. Sophos. (2021). The State of Ransomware 2021.
  9. Bissell, K., Lasalle, R., Dal Cin, M., Patton, J., & Williams, J. (2020). Stalking the Adversary: Hunting Command-and-Control Infrastructure. Microsoft. https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2020/03/26/stalking-the-adversary-hunting-command-and-control-infrastructure/
  10. Capgemini. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity. https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Artificial-intelligence-in-cybersecurity_Capgemini-Research-Institute.pdf
  11. Micro Focus. (2021). 2021 Cyber Resilient Organization Report. https://www.microfocus.com/media/report/2021-cyber-resilient-organization-report
  12. Columbus, L. (2021). State Of AI And Machine Learning In Cybersecurity. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2021/05/09/state-of-ai-and-machine-learning-in-cybersecurity/?sh=e8bcf7b7c8b0
  13. MITRE Engenuity. (2021). MITRE Evaluation: AI-Enabled Cybersecurity Product Assessments. https://www.mitre-engenuity.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2021/08/21-0163-AI-Product-Assessments-7.19.pdf
  14. VentureBeat. (2020). Forrester: The Top Emerging Technologies For Cybersecurity In 2021. https://venturebeat.com/2020/11/10/forrester-the-top-emerging-technologies-for-cybersecurity-in-2021/
  15. DARPA. (2019). AI Next Campaign. https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/ai-next-campaign
  16. Nichols, S. (2021). How AI Helped The Secret Service Track Down Cybercriminals. StateTech Magazine. https://statetechmagazine.com/article/2021/10/how-ai-helped-secret-service-track-down-cybercriminals
  17. CB Insights. (2021). Cyber Defenders: 78+ Startups Protecting The Enterprise From Cyberattacks. CB Insights Research. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/cybersecurity-market-map-company-list/
  18. Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018). Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning. Pattern Recognition, 84, 317-331.
  19. Paudice, A., Muñoz-González, L., Gyorgy, A., & Lupu, E. C. (2018). Detection of adversarial training examples in poisoning attacks through anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03041.
  20. Kelley, M. B. (2019). DARPA to Exploit Social Media, Messaging & Blog Data to Track … Propaganda and Disinformation. Military.com. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/05/31/darpa-exploit-social-media-messaging-blog-data-track-propaganda-and-disinformation.html
  21. Yu, D., Qian, K., Huang, J., & Yu, Y. (2021). A Survey on Visual Explainable AI. ACM Computing Surveys.
SAKHRI Mohamed
SAKHRI Mohamed

I hold a bachelor's degree in political science and international relations as well as a Master's degree in international security studies, alongside a passion for web development. During my studies, I gained a strong understanding of key political concepts, theories in international relations, security and strategic studies, as well as the tools and research methods used in these fields.

Articles: 14301

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *