:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/shutterstock_260703998_department_of_housing_and_urban_development_1-5bfc3abac9e77c002634725d.jpg?w=680&resize=680,440&ssl=1 "Housing Policy and Urbanization in the United States")
Housing policy and urbanization are intricately linked in the United States. Housing policies at the federal, state and local levels have played a major role in shaping patterns of urbanization and suburbanization over the past century. Meanwhile, urbanization trends and demands have necessitated the development of new housing policies and programs. This complex relationship has evolved significantly since the early 20th century.
This article provides an overview of the history of federal, state and local housing policies in the U.S. and their impact on urbanization. It traces key policies, programs and trends from the early public housing initiatives in the 1930s to the rise of suburbia and urban decline in the postwar era. The evolution of federal housing programs and policies in the 1960s-1980s, including rent control and affordability measures, are examined. Local government efforts to revitalize cities and address homelessness since the 1990s are also analyzed. The article concludes with a discussion of contemporary housing challenges in an increasingly urbanized country and policy directions.
New Deal Public Housing Projects (1930s-1940s)
The first major federal intervention in housing came with the Public Works Administration (PWA) Housing Division created in 1933 as part of the New Deal. The PWA funded clearance and construction of public housing projects aimed at job creation and slum clearance in the Great Depression era. Over 50 housing projects were constructed in cities across the U.S. through the PWA before it was disbanded in 1939.
The New Deal also saw creation of the United States Housing Authority (USHA) in 1937, which ushered in federal funding for local public housing agencies. The USHA initiated the nation’s first public housing developments, focused on providing “decent, safe and sanitary dwellings” for low-income families. Early public housing projects like Carl Mackley Houses in Philadelphia and Harlem River Houses in New York City were constructed with federal loans and grants through the USHA. Over 100,000 public housing units were funded before WWII.
These early public housing initiatives sought to improve living conditions for the urban poor and stimulate the economy. However, many projects were poorly constructed and maintained. Stigmatization of public housing as housing of last resort for the poorest residents also took root in this era. Racial segregation and discrimination in tenant selection for projects were also prevalent, foreshadowing future controversies. Nonetheless, the PWA and USHA established the foundation for permanent federal involvement in housing provision.
Housing Shortages, Suburbanization and Urban Decline in the Postwar Era
A severe housing shortage after WWII led to the Housing Act of 1949, which authorized federal loans and grants to aid slum clearance and construction of over 800,000 public housing units nationwide. But suburban single-family homes were still outpacing new urban housing construction, facilitated by federal mortgage interest deductions and highway building programs.
White flight from cities to suburbs accelerated in the 1950s and 1960s as African Americans migrated to northern cities in the Great Migration. With support from the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Veterans Administration (VA), federal mortgage insurance made homeownership affordable for middle-class white families in the suburbs while housing discrimination kept minority groups in inner cities. Urban renewal programs from 1949-1973 saw many minority neighborhoods razed and over 475,000 families displaced to build highways, civic centers, and other projects, deepening housing segregation.
As suburbanization drew people and jobs away, cities faced shrinking tax bases, disinvestment, and physical decline. Public housing facilities built hastily with cost-cutting designs and materials in the postwar period deteriorated rapidly. Policy failures became apparent—public housing had not ended the affordable housing crisis in cities or racial segregation. By the 1970s, cities were widely seen as undesirable places to live, especially by white families.
Federal Housing Programs in the 1960s-1980s
In response to ongoing housing challenges, the federal government enacted more programs and policies aimed at cities in the 1960s-1980s. The 1961 Housing Act funded urban renewal on a large scale along with new initiatives like Section 221(d)(3) mortgage insurance to stimulate private market affordable housing. The Fair Housing Act of 1968 banned discrimination in renting or buying homes, though enforcement was weak.
The 1969 Brooke Amendment capped public housing rents at 25 percent of tenants’ income, ending original notions of public housing as temporary assistance. In the 1970s, Section 8 rental vouchers let low-income residents choose private or public housing while the federal government subsidized rent. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program launched in 1974 still channels over $3 billion annually to cities for affordable housing and other uses.
But the economic crises of the 1970s stunted progress on housing goals. Soaring inflation and energy costs led many cities to pass rent control policies capping rent increases in certain buildings. Rent controls remain in place in cities like New York, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. today. However, critics argue controls contribute to housing shortages by discouraging new construction and maintenance.
The Reagan administration in the 1980s cut funding for subsidized housing programs as part of major federal spending reductions. Tax policies still favored homeowners over renters. As housing costs continued to rise faster than incomes in the 1980s, homelessness was becoming more visible in urban areas nationwide by the late 1980s.
Urban Policy Shifts and Housing Challenges from the 1990s
Persistently high homelessness, crime and poverty led many cities to shift urban policy directions starting in the 1990s. Efforts focused on revitalizing downtowns, improving public services and schools, rezoning for mixed-use development, and incentives to attract residents and businesses back from suburbs. Local housing policies embraced previously untested strategies like inclusionary zoning requiring affordable units in market-rate developments.
At the federal level, policymakers debated reforms to troubled public housing projects. HOPE VI grants from 1993-2010 funded demolition and redevelopment of many aging projects into lower-density mixed-income communities. Tax credits boosted private investment in affordable housing, and the HOME program granted block funds for state and local programs assisting renters and homeowners.
But housing affordability worsened nationwide as home values skyrocketed from the late 1990s to mid-2000s. The subprime mortgage crisis beginning in 2007 led to foreclosures and housing market crashes, devastating homeowners and communities. Although cities rebounded faster with new investments and rising populations, housing costs and rents have continued to outpace wage growth in this recovery.
Today cities face acute shortages of affordable housing along with rising homelessness associated with poverty, inequality and housing insecurity. Proposed solutions range from rent stabilization policies to new vouchers and taxes to fund affordable units. But addressing these complex challenges continues to require coordination across federal, state and city levels. Bipartisan efforts to reform zoning rules and reduce regulatory barriers to affordable housing construction are gaining support.
As urban living has regained widespread appeal, ensuring equitable access to safe, affordable housing remains a pressing concern in cities nationwide. Ongoing debates over renewing rental assistance programs and reforms to local land use policies will shape housing options for urban residents into the future. The interwoven relationship between federal and local housing policies and urban development continues to evolve.
Conclusion
In conclusion, federal, state and local housing policies have played an integral yet complex role in patterns of urbanization and development across the United States over the past century. As housing needs and challenges have changed amid demographic, social and economic shifts, governments have responded with evolving policies, programs and approaches. But enduring issues like segregation, inequality and supply shortages persist, requiring ongoing policy efforts to ensure safe, affordable housing in cities and suburbs alike in our increasingly urbanized nation. Further research and informed policy reforms are essential to promote equitable housing outcomes and sustainably vibrant communities in the 21st century.
References
Schwartz, A. F. (2014). Housing policy in the United States. Routledge.
O’Regan, K., & Quigley, J. M. (2000). Federal policy and the rise of nonprofit housing providers. Journal of Housing Research, 11(2), 297-317.
Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J. H., & Swanstrom, T. (2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. University Press of Kansas.
Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. The Urban Insitute.
Friedman, L. M. (1968). Public housing and the poor: An overview. California Law Review, 56(2), 642-669.
Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1995). Housing market constraints and spatial stratification by income and race. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 141-167.
O’Regan, K. M., & Quigley, J. M. (2000). Federal policy and the rise of nonprofit housing providers. Journal of Housing Research, 11(2), 297-317.
Quigley, J. M., & Raphael, S. (2004). Is housing unaffordable? Why isn’t it more affordable?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 191-214.
Kemeny, J. (1992). Housing and social theory. Routledge.
Schwartz, A. F. (2010). Housing policy in the United States. Routledge.
Carliner, M. S. (1998). Development of federal homeownership “policy”. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), 299-321.
Bratt, R. G., Stone, M. E., & Hartman, C. (Eds.). (2006). A right to housing: Foundation for a new social agenda. Temple University Press.
Sard, B., & Rice, D. (2008). Creating opportunity for children: How housing location can make a difference. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
