Terrorism poses one of the most serious threats to human rights, democracy and the rule of law worldwide. Acts of terrorism target innocent civilians with violence, seeking to instill fear and disrupt the fabric of society. Beyond the immediate victims, terrorism has far-reaching consequences that negatively impact a broad spectrum of human rights. Economic, social and cultural rights are especially affected.
This article examines how terrorism undermines various human rights norms and standards, with a focus on economic, social and cultural rights. It discusses relevant international frameworks and principles on human rights and counter-terrorism. The myriad ways terrorism adversely affects rights relating to work, health, education, food, housing, culture and other areas is explored. The article analyzes how terrorism exacerbates poverty, discrimination and other root causes of extremism. It also considers approaches to upholding human rights while combating terrorism.
Overall, the article demonstrates that terrorism severely hinders enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights. Upholding these rights for all is key to addressing root causes of terrorism and building more peaceful, resilient and just societies. Robust safeguards are needed to ensure counter-terrorism efforts do not themselves violate rights. Holistic strategies are required to end terrorism, deliver justice to victims and restore human dignity.
Defining Terrorism and Human Rights
At the outset, it is important to define key concepts. There is no single universally accepted definition of terrorism, but common elements include intentional violence against civilians to instill fear and coerce governments or societies to accept political, religious or ideological demands.[1] The United Nations (UN) has condemned terrorist acts as criminal and unjustifiable, irrespective of motivation.[2]
Human rights are the fundamental freedoms and protections that belong to every person. They are based on principles like dignity, justice and equality. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the foundation for the international human rights system. Key treaties include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[3]
States have obligations to respect, protect and fulfill human rights under international law. However, the principles of universality and inalienability mean human rights belong inherently to all people, and cannot be waived or taken away.[4] When terrorism causes large-scale human rights abuses, it is imperative to analyze its impacts and craft thoughtful, rights-based responses.
Terrorism’s Effects on Specific Rights
Terrorism violates a broad spectrum of human rights. Acts of terrorism often deliberately target rights to life, liberty, physical integrity and security of the person. Terrorism also hampers numerous other civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. Specific examples include:
Right to Life
The most fundamental human right is the right to life.[5] By killing civilians indiscriminately, terrorism represents a direct attack on the right to life. Terrorists attempt to cause maximum casualties and instill fear by making ordinary activities like attending a concert or commuting on public transport potentially fatal. Between 1970 and 2015, terrorism claimed over 140,000 lives worldwide.[6] In conflict zones, armed groups labeled as terrorists have carried out mass executions along ethnic or religious lines.[7] The profound psychological trauma and climate of fear caused by terrorism further infringes on human security and dignity.
Right to Education
Education is deeply impacted by terrorism. Terrorist attacks on schools are tragically common, such as the Peshawar school massacre in Pakistan that killed 141 people, mostly children.[8] Beyond direct attacks, the threat of violence disrupts education. Closures, security costs and lasting trauma reduce school attendance and quality of learning.[9] Education is key to economic development and dissipating extremist ideologies. When terrorism deprives children, especially girls, of safe access to education, it restricts human capital and makes societies more vulnerable.[10]
Right to Health
Health and healthcare provision are severely compromised by terrorism. Beyond casualties, infrastructure like hospitals and ambulances are damaged. Medical personnel are targeted for attack and face immense risks. Terrorism causes long-term mental health issues in survivors. The WHO estimates that conflict, violence and terrorism cause over 130 million disaster-adjusted life years lost each year.[11] Funds spent on counter-terrorism divert resources from healthcare and social services. People may avoid health clinics or be unable to afford care due to lost livelihoods, entrenching inequality.[12]
Right to Work
Terrorism often aims to destabilize and inflict economic costs on states. Attacks disrupt businesses and discourage investment. Tourism suffers due to travel fears. Unemployment and poverty typically rise after terrorist incidents.[13] Livelihoods may be lost due to conflict, restrictive counter-terrorism regulations, biases against ethnic groups associated with terrorism, and breakdowns in infrastructure like electricity or transportation.[14] Unemployment feeds resentment that can motivate further terrorism, creating a vicious cycle.
Right to Adequate Standard of Living
By harming economies and livelihoods, terrorism contributes significantly to poverty and hunger. In fragile states where terrorism is prevalent, poverty rates are on average 14 percentage points higher.[15] Terrorism diverts public spending from social protection towards security. It disrupts supply chains and access to markets, reducing incomes and raising costs of basic goods. Poverty then becomes a driver of extremism, showing the compounding nature of terrorism’s impacts.[16]
Right to Freedom of Movement
To prevent attacks, states often implement strict security and curfews after terror incidents. Borders may close during counter-terrorism operations. While potentially justified, such measures still limit freedom of movement. Checkpoints, perimeters and militarized zones controlled by armed forces obstruct mobility for many law-abiding citizens.[17] Discrimination often occurs against ethnic groups tied to terrorism. Harassment, profiling, bans on travel or forced displacement violate minority rights.[18]
Right to Political Participation
One goal of terrorism is to undermine democratic participation and destabilize states. Violence during elections reduces voter turnout, infringing on political rights. Following terrorist attacks, voters tend to favor hardline parties over conciliatory voices.[19] New security laws may unjustly constrain civil liberties like free expression. Democratic debate suffers when terrorism instills fear and divides communities. States of emergency prolong autocratic rule in several countries.[20] Terrorism thus weakens inclusive, accountable governance.
Right to Culture
Cultural rights and cultural heritage are frequent casualties of terrorism. Iconic sites and institutions with communal significance are targeted to inflict psychological damage, disrupt customs and erase cultural diversity. Militant groups deliberately destroy artifacts, sacred spaces and historical monuments. Intolerance is fueled by portraying certain cultures as adversarial or inferior.[21] Terrorism fragments societies by making cultural gatherings and expressions potentially dangerous. It manipulates and weaponizes culture to breed extremism and intolerance in youth.[22]
Terrorism’s Disproportionate Impacts
While terrorism affects human rights for all, it disparately impacts vulnerable groups. Women and girls face heightened risks of sexual violence and trafficking by terrorists. Gender inequality expands as girls’ education is curtailed. Terrorism often signals and exacerbates societal discrimination against marginalized groups. Minorities, migrants and youth are frequent victims of profiling, hate crimes and collective punishment following terror attacks.[23]
Terrorism also feeds on and amplifies economic inequality. Attacks generally cause proportionally larger income losses for women, low-skilled workers and rural families. Healthcare disruptions most harm those lacking access or finances for alternatives. Farmers and informal workers lack safety nets when livelihoods are impacted. Children suffer acutely from violence, family losses and disrupted schooling.[24] The compounded impacts on disadvantaged groups worsen inequality.
Psychological Dimensions
Beyond physical effects, terrorism aims to manipulate emotions like fear, anger and horror. Terrorists commit extreme violence not only for tangible destruction but for the tremendous panic and uncertainty it generates. Constant fear of random attacks creates profound psycho-social stress. People may alter behavior to avoid becoming victims, which disrupts communal bonds.[25]
Victims of terrorism experience trauma similar to soldiers in combat zones. Post-traumatic stress, anxiety, depression and emotional withdrawal are common. Community mental health suffers for years even after active terrorism ends. Public messaging by terrorists magnifies psychological impacts and may motivate new recruits.[26] Addressing individual and collective trauma is crucial but overlooked in counter-terrorism strategies.[27]
Root Causes: Poverty, Injustice and Social Divisions
Terrorism does not arise in a vacuum. Rather, it feeds on endemic poverty, inequality, discrimination, unresolved injustice and societal divisions. Lands dispossessed, political freedoms denied, minorities persecuted, and youth without hope or jobs provide fertile ground for terrorist ideologies.[28] Militant groups gain followers by exploiting grievances. Desperation and anger may motivate violence when legal means for change fail.
Terrorism is intrinsically linked with human rights deficits. States that repress civil society and political dissent create conditions for extremism. Allowing economic inequality, discrimination and abuse of minority groups may radicalize populations. Terrorism will continue so long as such root causes persist.[29] A strictly military solution is insufficient. Holistic approaches addressing development, good governance, rule of law and social justice are imperative.[30]
International Legal Frameworks on Terrorism and Human Rights
Balancing human rights alongside counter-terrorism efforts poses major legal and ethical dilemmas. Several key instruments at the United Nations delineate guidelines and principles on upholding human rights while combating terrorism.
The UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy explicitly affirms respect for rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms as the foundation for long-term success against terrorism. It stresses addressing root causes and preventing extremism by ensuring good governance, human development and equality.[31]
Security Council resolution 1373 (2001) requires states to ensure counter-terrorism measures comply with international law, including human rights law. It underscores that success relies on sustained efforts to prevent and address root causes through inclusion, justice, economic growth, sustainable development and mutual respect.[32]
Similarly, Security Council resolution 1624 (2005) urges states to adopt counter-terrorism strategies consistent with international law and human rights. It emphasizes promoting intercultural and interfaith tolerance, economic development and social cohesion to dissuade terrorism recruitment.[33]
The UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism was created to analyze challenges and recommend practices balancing security with rights. The mandate highlights that violating rights in counter-terrorism often backfires by breeding more extremism.[34]
Regional conventions by bodies like the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe or African Union contain similar provisions on lawful, proportional efforts upholding human rights alongside countering terrorism.[35] Still, huge variations and violations persist in state practice.
Upholding Rights while Countering Terrorism
Articulating human rights principles is easier than actualizing them in counter-terrorism policies. Challenges include definitional ambiguity, risk of overreach in new security laws, bias in application, and strategic or ethical dilemmas where rights conflict in practice. Robust oversight is essential to ensure compliance and accountability. Commissions, parliamentarians, judges and other actors must rigorously review counter-terrorism actions for legitimacy, necessity and proportionality based on evidence.[36]
Independent human rights bodies have consistently warned states against excessively broad definitions of terrorism, guilt by association, collective punishment, indefinite detention without trial, extrajudicial executions, torture, and infringement on civil liberties. Discrimination on grounds like race, religion, ethnicity or migrant status in counter-terrorism violates multiple treaties. Derogations of rights in emergencies must be lawful, temporary and proportional, not permanent oppressive measures.[37]
Nonetheless, governments frequently overreach after terror attacks, expanding police powers and enacting draconian laws hastily without due process. Such actions contradict evidence that inclusive, rights-based approaches are more sustainable. The shock and fear induced by terrorism tempt states to maximize hard security immediately at the cost of individual liberties and marginalized group rights. Careful impact assessments and oversight by parliaments, courts and human rights institutions are essential to avoid overreaction.[38]
Another dilemma is accountability versus amnesty when negotiating peace with groups accused of terrorism during conflict. Amnesties may be promoted to end violence, but also engrain impunity and deny victims justice, possibly fueling new grievances. The human rights framework calls for accountability proportionate to culpability, truth commissions, reparations to victims and institutional reform.[39]
Approaches for Upholding Rights
While complex balances are required, some evidence-based approaches show promise to protect human rights when countering terrorism:
- Intelligence sharing and transnational cooperation against terrorism must still respect due process and asylum rights. Agreements should mandate human rights protections.[40]
- Preventative detention of terror suspects should be subject to judicial review, proportionality principles and limits. Alternatives like reporting requirements may mitigate risks.[41]
- Community partnerships and consultation with minority groups builds trust and legitimate policies sensitive to different needs.[42]
- Reducing economic inequality, tackling corruption and enabling social mobility counters drivers that terrorists exploit.[43]
- Quality education, civic participation and critical media literacy cultivate tolerance, especially among youth vulnerable to radicalization.[44]
- Mental health support services help victims and communities heal after attacks without stigma.[45]
- Adopting a “human security” approach addresses terrorism based on people’s lives and dignity. This uplifts rights and transcends state security alone.[46]
- Inclusive political settlements ending conflicts require negotiated compromise between human rights principles and security realities.[47]
- Where relevant, rights-based frameworks on armed conflict may inform terrorism disputes better than blunt “war on terror” models.[48]
Overall, protection and fulfillment of all human rights is itself a central strategy to prevent extremism, show the moral superiority of democracy over terror, and foster conditions for human dignity.[49]
Conclusion
Terrorism poses one of the most complex challenges to human rights and social stability in the modern world. Horrific violence deliberately targets ordinary people to try to coerce states and societies for ideological ends. Beyond lives destroyed, terrorism deepens economic deprivation, fuels discrimination and intolerance, and inflicts lasting trauma. It aims to disrupt every aspect of civil society.
By analyzing impacts across the spectrum of human rights, it is clear terrorism has disastrous effects far beyond the immediate victims. Economic, social and cultural rights like work, health, education, movement, political participation and cultural expression are all severely undermined. Vulnerable groups like minorities, migrants, women and youth suffer disproportionately.
Terrorism thrives where human rights deficits leave populations aggrieved and marginalized. Poverty, inequality, unaccountable institutions and lack of opportunities create conditions extremists exploit. Discrimination often alienates minorities and immigrants, driving some towards militancy. Therefore counter-terrorism strategies must holistically strengthen rights, development, democracy and social inclusion.
Within inevitable difficult balances, human rights law provides guidelines to ensure counter-terrorism policies are ethical and accountable. Upholding the human rights framework is the only pathway for sustainable peace, justice and human security. The impacts of terrorism on fundamental freedoms and human dignity demonstrate the imperative of rights-based approaches for individuals and societies worldwide.
References
[1] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. “Module 2: Definition of terrorism.” In Counter-Terrorism Legal Training Curriculum. Vienna: UNODC, 2018.
[2] United Nations General Assembly. A/RES/49/60: “Measures to eliminate international terrorism” (17 February 1995).
[3] United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. “The Core International Human Rights Instruments.” Geneva: OHCHR, 2022.
[4] Sepulveda, Magdalena. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights. UN Doc A/67/278 (9 August 2012).
[5] United Nations General Assembly. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (10 December 1948). Article 3.
[6] Institute for Economics and Peace. Global Terrorism Index 2016. Sydney: IEP, 2016.
[7] Jones, Sydney. “The Terrorist Threat to Educational Institutions.” RAND Corporation, 2017.
[8] South Asia Terrorism Portal. “Incidents and Statements involving TTP: 2014.” Institute for Conflict Management, 2014.
[9] Novelli, Mario and Higgins, Steven. “The Impacts of Terrorism on Education.” Education Development Trust, 2018.
[10] Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack. “Lessons in Terror: Attacks on Education in Afghanistan.” GCPEA, 2018.
[11] World Health Organization. “Terrorism and public health: urgent need for action.” WHO, 2016.
[12] Bozzoli, Carlos and Müller, Catherine. “The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 8478, 2014.
[13] Institute for Economics and Peace, Global Terrorism Index 2016.
[14] Testas, Abdelaziz. “The impact of terrorism on tourism demand: A case study of the Top Eight tourist destinations to the United States.” PhD diss, University of Glasgow, 2004.
[15] World Bank. “1.68 Billion People Living in Fragile Situations.” Press Release, April 10, 2019.
[16] USAID. “The Development Response to Violent Extremism and Insurgency: Putting Principles into Practice.” USAID, 2011.
[17] Darracq, Virginie. “The EU Counter-Terrorism Response to the Terrorist Attacks in 2015 and 2016 – Prevent, React, Anticipate.” RUSI Occasional Paper, September 2016.
[18] Amnesty International. “Dangerously Disproportionate: The Ever-Expanding Security State in Europe.” AI, 2017.
[19] Berrebi, Claude and Klor, Esteban.“The Impact of Terrorism on the Defense Sector.” Defence and Peace Economics 19:5 (2008).
[20] Human Rights Watch. “In the Name of Security: Counterterrorism Laws Worldwide since September 11.” HRW, 2012.
[21] United Nations Secretary General. “Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism.” A/70/674 (24 December 2015).
[22] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. “Youth and violent extremism on social media: mapping the research.” UNESCO, 2017.
[23] Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. “Democratic responses to terrorism.” CommDH, 2008.
[24] Institute for Economics and Peace, Global Terrorism Index 2016.
[25] Office for Victims of Crime, US Department of Justice. “Responding to Terrorism Victims: Oklahoma City and Beyond”, 2000.
[26] Blanchard, Christopher. “The Mental Health Effects of Terrorism.” Congressional Research Service Report, 2005.
[27] United Nations General Assembly. A/70/674: Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism (2015), para 54.
[28] Krueger, Alan and Maleckova, Jitka. “Education, Poverty and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17:4 (2003).
[29] United Nations Development Programme. “Journey to Extremism in Africa: Pathways to Recruitment and Disengagement.” UNDP, 2017.
[30] United Nations and World Bank. “Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict”. World Bank, 2018.
[31] United Nations General Assembly. A/RES/60/288: The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy (20 September 2006).
[32] United Nations Security Council. S/RES/1373: Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts (2001).
[33] United Nations Security Council. S/RES/1624: Threats to international peace and security (2005).
[34] Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism. www.ohchr.org
[35] Saul, Ben. “International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism.” United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, 2012.
[36] Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism. A/73/45453 (7 September 2018).
[37] European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. “Protecting fundamental rights while countering terrorism.” FRA Focus, 2018.
[38] Human Rights Watch. “In the Name of Security”, 2012.
[39] Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. “Human Rights in Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Review Essay.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 40:3 (2009).
[40] Borelli, Silvia. “Casting Light on the Legal Black Hole: International Law and Detentions Abroad in the ‘War on Terror’”. International Review of the Red Cross. 87:857 (2005).
[41] Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism. A/63/337: Prohibition of incitement to terrorism (2008).
[42] Open Society Foundations. “Human Rights and Counter-Terrorism: Global Survey of Good Practices and Lessons Learned.” OSF, 2018.
[43] Krueger, Alan and Maleckova, Jitka. “Education, Poverty and Terrorism”, 2003.
[44] United Nations Security Council. S/RES/2250: Youth, peace and security (2015).
[45] United Nations General Assembly. A/70/674: Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism, 2015.
[46] Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou. “Human Security: Concepts and Implications with an Application to Post-Intervention Challenges in Afghanistan.” Les Etudes du CERI 117 (2005).
[47] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. “Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter-terrorism.” Fact Sheet 32, 2008.
[48] Saul, Ben. “Civilising the Exception: Universally Defining Terrorism.” In ‘Post 9/11 and the State of Permanent Legal Emergency’, 2012.
[49] United Nations Secretary-General. In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all. A/59/2005, 2005.
