A nation’s political system plays a significant role in shaping its cultural values and norms, including those around work. Japan provides an interesting case study for examining how political systems can actively promote certain work cultures.
Japan has been characterized by a strong work ethic, group harmony, loyalty to firms, and high productivity since the postwar period. However, these aspects of Japanese work culture are not inherent to Japanese society and have their roots in policies enacted by Japan’s dominant political party for most of the postwar period – the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). This article will analyze how Japan’s political system promoted the establishment and reinforcement of certain work culture traits after World War II.
The article will begin with an overview of Japan’s political system in the postwar period. It will then examine the economic and labor policies of the Japanese government under the LDP and how they cultivated Japan’s work ethics and norms. The article will also discuss how government-business relations and the concept of “Japan Inc.” contributed to a unique corporate culture. Finally, potential challenges to Japan’s traditional work culture due to recent political, economic and demographic changes will be considered.
Postwar Politics in Japan
Japan’s political system in the postwar era has been dominated by the LDP. The LDP was formed in 1955 and has ruled Japan for over fifty years since then, with the exception of a few short intervals. The party’s longevity can be attributed to its pragmatic policies, flexible ideology, as well as factional dynamics that reduced intra-party conflicts.
The core of Japan’s political system in this period has been the “iron triangle” – the close relationships between the LDP’s elected politicians, the career bureaucrats, and large corporations. The LDP politicians relied on votes from corporate interests and rural constituents to get elected. In exchange, they formulated policies that benefited large Japanese corporations. The economic ministries were staffed by elite career bureaucrats who regulated industry and implemented policies. These ministries worked closely with corporations in their sectors to design policies.
This iron triangle system promoted cooperative ties between the government, bureaucracy and businesses. The system resulted in policies that encouraged lifetime employment, company welfare schemes, as well as high private savings rates that could be channeled into industrial investment. All these factors created an environment conducive to certain work culture traits.
Cultivating Loyalty to Firms
The Japanese government encouraged loyalty to firms and long-term stable employment in several ways in the postwar period. Lifetime employment was not a natural phenomenon in Japan, but was actively promoted by corporate laws and policies.
During the U.S. occupation in the early postwar years, reforms focused on strengthening labor rights. But from the 1950s, government policies shifted to promoting stability in labor-management relations. In the mid-1950s, the LDP government introduced laws that made it harder for companies to lay off excess workers in economic downturns. The laws also normalized the long-term bonus system which rewarded employee loyalty.
Companies were prevented from using layoffs, and instead adopted long-term employment that socialized workers to have loyalty to their firms. The government gave tax concessions to companies that offered lifetime employment programs. The courts also typically did not recognize unilateral termination of lifetime employment contracts by firms.
Seniority-based pay and promotions provided further incentives for loyal, long-term service. The government urged employers to pay workers based on seniority rather than performance. This system enhanced the prestige attached to long tenure at a firm.
The Japanese tax system also encouraged companies to retain earnings rather than pay them out as dividends. Firms used these earnings to provide stable employment and benefits protecting workers against income loss, build employee loyalty.
Promoting Group Harmony and Consensus
Various policies and institutions in postwar Japan fostered group harmony and consensus-based decision making within companies. These norms facilitated coordination and cooperation among workers within firms.
Japan adopted American-style company unions after WWII which organized workers within each company rather than by industry. Enterprise unions along with lifetime employment cultivated workers’ identification and harmony with their firm rather than their industry or working class.
The LDP government also established the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency and passed the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Basic Law to promote cooperativism among workers and management in small enterprises. Policies benefited these enterprises in return for upholding harmonious industrial relations.
Companies created enterprise-based welfare schemes providing housing, pensions, recreation and insurance for their workers. This welfare corporatism generated loyalty to firms and workplace harmony.
Within firms, decision-making based on consultation and consensus rather than conflict pervaded. The limited postwar unionization rate facilitated this norms. Enterprise unions lacked the power for confrontational collective bargaining over wages and working conditions.
Companies also developed extensive enterprise-specific skills among their workers rather than relying on skills learned elsewhere. This enhanced workers’ incentives to conform to corporate goals. The seniority system facilitated loyalty and conformity to corporate culture.
Fostering High Productivity and Work Ethic
The Japanese government played an active role in the rapid catch-up growth of postwar Japan to become an advanced economy. Government economic institutions and policies were geared towards promoting high productivity, quality, and work ethic among companies and workers.
The Economic Planning Agency directed infrastructure building, strategically allocated resources to targeted industries, and controlled imports to shield nascent industries. The Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) actively nurtured development of technology intensive and heavy industries through subsidies, tax concessions and protection.
The tax system, along with high household savings rates, channeled resources from households to companies to fund intensive capital investment. This promoted rapid automation, intensive work processes and quality control.
Companies enthusiastically adopted productivity enhancing and quality control techniques from the U.S like statistical quality control. MITI’s merging of small-medium firms into business consortia for exports fostered competition and peer pressure for productivity gains.
Enterprise unions cooperated with management to improve productivity and product quality rather than bargained over pay and conditions. Unions moderated wage demands during downturns to maintain employment. They helped implement innovations in production methods.
The lifetime employment system incentivized experienced workers to share knowledge and train new workers to enhance productivity. Worker loyalty and identification with company goals led to discretionary effort to improve results.
Government-Business Relations Supporting Work Culture
The postwar Japanese political economy or “Japan Inc” was characterized by extensive government-business cooperation and guidance. This nexus supportedJapan’s economic rise and work culture development.
The economic bureaucrats maintained extensive informal ties with companies. As part of the postwar purge of militarists, bureaucrats recruited new business elites to implement industrial policies. These ties persisted through personnel networks called amakudari where bureaucrats retired into private companies. Through these networks, bureaucrats could coordinate policies with corporations.
The Keidanren business association represented big business interests to the LDP and economic ministries. It played a key role in consensus building and resolving disputes between industries on policies. The peak level employer association Nikkeiren helped stabilize labor relations. These corporatist institutions reinforced cooperative work relations.
The government provided extensive guidance to companies on work organization and employment practices. For instance, the Ministry of Labor released white papers and leaflets with model HR practices like enterprise unions, seniority wages and in-house training. These practices were actively diffused through government channels and business associations.
Potential Challenges to Traditional Work Culture
While Japan’s postwar work culture has been distinctive, several recent challenges may transform aspects of this culture going forward.
The LOSS of LDP dominance and political realignment since the 1990s has led to reform in areas like labor laws. For instance, the Labor Standards Act was revised in the late 1990s to increase flexibility in working hours.
Rapid technological change poses difficulties for jobs-for-life employment. Firms have reduced lifetime employment guarantees and increased performance-based pay rather than seniority-based wages.
The shift towards market-oriented policies and deregulation since the 1990s has reduced policy support for firms to retain excess labor. Layoffs by major firms have increased.
Japan’s population is rapidly aging with fewer young people entering the labor force. A shrinking labor force reduces firms’ abilities to guarantee lifetime employment.
Globalization requires greater focus on shareholder interests and international standards rather than a Japan specific model. For instance, Japan adopted common international accounting and financial standards in the 2000s.
Increasing labor mobility between firms, especially among younger workers reluctant to commit to lifetime employment, weakens loyalty to firms.
Conclusion
Japan’s postwar political economy proactively fostered the emergence of certain work culture traits like loyalty to firms, group harmony, high productivity and consensus-based decision making. The policies and institutions under LDP dominance cultivated and reinforced these norms over decades. However, as the LDP’s power has waned and the socioeconomic context changed in recent years, some aspects of Japan’s traditional work culture face challenges. Though a strong work ethic remains entrenched, jobs-for-life employment, seniority wages and enterprise unions may weaken in the long run.
The case of postwar Japan illustrates how work cultures are not static but shaped by active efforts of governments and other institutions. As Japan’s politics and economy evolve, its work culture will also continue to change in the coming decades.
References
Hashimoto, M. (2000). The Japanese employment system and labour market reforms. In S. Fajertag & P. Pochet (Eds.), Social pacts in Europe – new dynamics (pp. 453–474). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
Jackson, G. (2010). Actors and institutions. In G. Jackson, R. Deeg, & W. Kiekner (Eds.) Capitalisms Compared (pp. 39-64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matanle, P. (2003). Japanese Capitalism and Modernity in a Global Era. London: Routledge.
Matanle, P., Mccann, L. and Ashmore, D. (2008). Men under Pressure: Representations of the Japanese salaryman and his organization in the popular culture. Organization, 15(4), pp.629-648.
Nitta, M. (2011). The politics of structural reforms: Industrial revival and the developmental state in Japan. In S. Lechevalier (Ed.) The Great Transformation of Japanese Capitalism (pp. 112-133). London: Routledge.
Piore, M. and Sabel, C. (1984). The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.
Sako, M. (2006). Shuntō: The role of employer and union co-ordination at the industry and inter-sectoral levels. In H. Gospel and J. Waddington (Eds.) Consensus and disunity among union and employer associations in Japan, the US and Europe (pp. 96-138). London: Routledge.
Schoppa, L. (2006). Race for the exits: The unraveling of Japan’s system of social protection. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Shibata, H. (2016). Reshaping the industrial relations system in Japan: The 2000s. Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(5), 669–693.
Sugeno, K. and Suwa, Y. (1997). Labour law issues in the 1990s: Review of the past and prospects for the future. Japan Labor Review, 3(4), 5-34
